From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10265 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2004 14:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10251 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2004 14:14:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp) (210.190.142.172) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2004 14:14:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (p3201-ipad32funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [221.189.135.201]) by smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6E54DB; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:13:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 14:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20040307.232138.74755320.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: drow@false.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: remote debugging a multi-threaded program with signal From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: <20040306171112.GA23154@nevyn.them.org> References: <20040305163854.GA23778@nevyn.them.org> <20040306.215001.74755311.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20040306171112.GA23154@nevyn.them.org> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00133.txt >>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:11:13 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: >> Hmm... then it might be better to backport all vCont stuff? Of >> course upgrading to upcoming gdb 6.1 will be the best solution, but >> I can not for now by some internal reason ... :-\ drow> Yes, I would rather you backport vCont than we add hacks to drow> gdbserver to guess :) I can tell you that the only changes to drow> support vCont (as far as I remember, anyway) were in remote.c. drow> It was pretty simple client-side. Thanks for your suggestion. I'll try to do it. --- Atsushi Nemoto From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10265 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2004 14:14:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10251 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2004 14:14:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp) (210.190.142.172) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2004 14:14:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (p3201-ipad32funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [221.189.135.201]) by smtp.mba.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6E54DB; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 23:13:58 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040307.232138.74755320.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: drow@false.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: remote debugging a multi-threaded program with signal From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: <20040306171112.GA23154@nevyn.them.org> References: <20040305163854.GA23778@nevyn.them.org> <20040306.215001.74755311.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20040306171112.GA23154@nevyn.them.org> X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20040319000900.IedRMi1KKKWHwAGC4q_NJsjzZZ4wAHXXslVZ57sZWxw@z> >>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:11:13 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: >> Hmm... then it might be better to backport all vCont stuff? Of >> course upgrading to upcoming gdb 6.1 will be the best solution, but >> I can not for now by some internal reason ... :-\ drow> Yes, I would rather you backport vCont than we add hacks to drow> gdbserver to guess :) I can tell you that the only changes to drow> support vCont (as far as I remember, anyway) were in remote.c. drow> It was pretty simple client-side. Thanks for your suggestion. I'll try to do it. --- Atsushi Nemoto