From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24983 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2004 18:47:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24962 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2004 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.129.200.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2004 18:47:22 -0000 Received: from gnu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4622B92; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:47:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40462836.1080706@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 18:47:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20040217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Orjan Friberg Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/CRIS] Prologue scan bug fixes, return_value implementation References: <40460A69.2060600@axis.com> <20040303164450.GA18032@nevyn.them.org> <40460ED4.4040201@axis.com> In-Reply-To: <40460ED4.4040201@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00051.txt Message-ID: <20040303184700.xySIQzzgO35j8ZOCdsoCfQLl7R9QAx8dHs2PTJQdhDQ@z> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >> >> As Andrew mentioned, you're the listed maintainer of the CRIS port - >> you don't need approval for changes to CRIS-specific files. I think >> that at this point it's appropriate for the branch also. > > > Ah, ok. I'm being overly cautious. Thanks for the clarification. Yes. Since the absolute worst possible outcome for such a commit is you breaking the CRIS architecture, it is entirely up to you to decide if its worth the risk :-) Andrew