From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30717 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2004 23:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30710 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 23:15:11 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AxDfr-0001Bt-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:15:11 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 73C424B104; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:15:19 -0500 (EST) To: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] C++ testsuite fix for unsigned char Message-Id: <20040228231519.73C424B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:15:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00867.txt.bz2 Approved, provided that you've tested it at least once. > By the way, this test would be invalid C since it relies on the behavior of > signed overflow. I'm not sure about C++ but I suspect it's the same. You are right. It would be okay with me to change all the 'c' from 'char' to 'unsigned char'. It's about templates, not about whether chars are 'signed' or 'unsigned'. Michael C === 2004-02-28 Daniel Jacobowitz * gdb.cp/ctti.exp: Handle unsigned char type.