From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26441 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2004 18:30:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26434 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2004 18:30:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2004 18:30:28 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ax9EJ-0004WT-QJ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:30:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ob] user-regs.c build fix for arm-linux Message-ID: <20040228183027.GA17364@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040228173121.GA15679@nevyn.them.org> <4040D178.2050405@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4040D178.2050405@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00851.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:35:52PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >+/* We call this gdb_user_regs instead of user_regs to avoid conflicts with > >+ any struct user_regs in system headers (for instance, ARM GNU/Linux). > >*/ > > Please be more explicit. What else would you like to know? What header it comes from? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer