From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix TUI build failure on AiX 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040225011117.GF542@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403BDBC2.3080108@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]
> >So I suggest the following change, where I appended "tui_" to
> >the variable names to avoid the macro expansion (short of finding
> >a better replacement name).
> >
> >2004-02-23 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
> >
> > * tui-disasm.c: %s/lines/tui_lines/g to avoid a collision
> > with the lines macro defined in term.h on AiX.
>
> For this one I think "asm_lines" reads better.
Agreed.
> > * tui-regs.c: %s/label_width/tui_label_width/g, to avoid
> > a collision with the label_width macro defined in term.h on AiX.
>
> For this one, yes, I can't think of anything better. Suggest adding a
> comment so that someone doesn't change it back.
>
> Either way, obishly approved,
> Andrew
Thank you. Here is what I ended up checking in.
2004-02-24 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* tui/tui-disasm.c: %s/lines/asm_lines/g to avoid a collision
with the lines macro defined in term.h on AiX.
* tui/tui-regs.c: %s/label_width/tui_label_width/g, to avoid
a collision with the label_width macro defined in term.h on AiX.
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: tui-aix.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 10023 bytes --]
Index: tui-disasm.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/tui/tui-disasm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 tui-disasm.c
--- tui-disasm.c 10 Feb 2004 19:08:15 -0000 1.13
+++ tui-disasm.c 25 Feb 2004 01:05:14 -0000
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct tui_asm_line
Disassemble count lines starting at pc.
Return address of the count'th instruction after pc. */
static CORE_ADDR
-tui_disassemble (struct tui_asm_line* lines, CORE_ADDR pc, int count)
+tui_disassemble (struct tui_asm_line* asm_lines, CORE_ADDR pc, int count)
{
struct ui_file *gdb_dis_out;
@@ -59,22 +59,22 @@ tui_disassemble (struct tui_asm_line* li
gdb_dis_out = tui_sfileopen (256);
/* Now construct each line */
- for (; count > 0; count--, lines++)
+ for (; count > 0; count--, asm_lines++)
{
- if (lines->addr_string)
- xfree (lines->addr_string);
- if (lines->insn)
- xfree (lines->insn);
+ if (asm_lines->addr_string)
+ xfree (asm_lines->addr_string);
+ if (asm_lines->insn)
+ xfree (asm_lines->insn);
print_address (pc, gdb_dis_out);
- lines->addr = pc;
- lines->addr_string = xstrdup (tui_file_get_strbuf (gdb_dis_out));
+ asm_lines->addr = pc;
+ asm_lines->addr_string = xstrdup (tui_file_get_strbuf (gdb_dis_out));
ui_file_rewind (gdb_dis_out);
pc = pc + gdb_print_insn (pc, gdb_dis_out);
- lines->insn = xstrdup (tui_file_get_strbuf (gdb_dis_out));
+ asm_lines->insn = xstrdup (tui_file_get_strbuf (gdb_dis_out));
/* reset the buffer to empty */
ui_file_rewind (gdb_dis_out);
@@ -92,21 +92,21 @@ tui_find_disassembly_address (CORE_ADDR
CORE_ADDR new_low;
int max_lines;
int i;
- struct tui_asm_line* lines;
+ struct tui_asm_line* asm_lines;
max_lines = (from > 0) ? from : - from;
if (max_lines <= 1)
return pc;
- lines = (struct tui_asm_line*) alloca (sizeof (struct tui_asm_line)
+ asm_lines = (struct tui_asm_line*) alloca (sizeof (struct tui_asm_line)
* max_lines);
- memset (lines, 0, sizeof (struct tui_asm_line) * max_lines);
+ memset (asm_lines, 0, sizeof (struct tui_asm_line) * max_lines);
new_low = pc;
if (from > 0)
{
- tui_disassemble (lines, pc, max_lines);
- new_low = lines[max_lines - 1].addr;
+ tui_disassemble (asm_lines, pc, max_lines);
+ new_low = asm_lines[max_lines - 1].addr;
}
else
{
@@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ tui_find_disassembly_address (CORE_ADDR
else
new_low += 1 * max_lines;
- tui_disassemble (lines, new_low, max_lines);
- last_addr = lines[pos].addr;
+ tui_disassemble (asm_lines, new_low, max_lines);
+ last_addr = asm_lines[pos].addr;
} while (last_addr > pc && msymbol);
/* Scan forward disassembling one instruction at a time
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ tui_find_disassembly_address (CORE_ADDR
if (pos >= max_lines)
pos = 0;
- next_addr = tui_disassemble (&lines[pos], last_addr, 1);
+ next_addr = tui_disassemble (&asm_lines[pos], last_addr, 1);
/* If there are some problems while disassembling exit. */
if (next_addr <= last_addr)
@@ -155,12 +155,12 @@ tui_find_disassembly_address (CORE_ADDR
pos++;
if (pos >= max_lines)
pos = 0;
- new_low = lines[pos].addr;
+ new_low = asm_lines[pos].addr;
}
for (i = 0; i < max_lines; i++)
{
- xfree (lines[i].addr_string);
- xfree (lines[i].insn);
+ xfree (asm_lines[i].addr_string);
+ xfree (asm_lines[i].insn);
}
return new_low;
}
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ tui_set_disassem_content (CORE_ADDR pc)
CORE_ADDR cur_pc;
struct tui_gen_win_info * locator = tui_locator_win_info_ptr ();
int tab_len = tui_default_tab_len ();
- struct tui_asm_line* lines;
+ struct tui_asm_line* asm_lines;
int insn_pos;
int addr_size, max_size;
char* line;
@@ -195,24 +195,24 @@ tui_set_disassem_content (CORE_ADDR pc)
max_lines = TUI_DISASM_WIN->generic.height - 2; /* account for hilite */
/* Get temporary table that will hold all strings (addr & insn). */
- lines = (struct tui_asm_line*) alloca (sizeof (struct tui_asm_line)
+ asm_lines = (struct tui_asm_line*) alloca (sizeof (struct tui_asm_line)
* max_lines);
- memset (lines, 0, sizeof (struct tui_asm_line) * max_lines);
+ memset (asm_lines, 0, sizeof (struct tui_asm_line) * max_lines);
line_width = TUI_DISASM_WIN->generic.width - 1;
- tui_disassemble (lines, pc, max_lines);
+ tui_disassemble (asm_lines, pc, max_lines);
/* See what is the maximum length of an address and of a line. */
addr_size = 0;
max_size = 0;
for (i = 0; i < max_lines; i++)
{
- size_t len = strlen (lines[i].addr_string);
+ size_t len = strlen (asm_lines[i].addr_string);
if (len > addr_size)
addr_size = len;
- len = strlen (lines[i].insn) + tab_len;
+ len = strlen (asm_lines[i].insn) + tab_len;
if (len > max_size)
max_size = len;
}
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ tui_set_disassem_content (CORE_ADDR pc)
element = (struct tui_win_element *) TUI_DISASM_WIN->generic.content[i];
src = &element->which_element.source;
- strcpy (line, lines[i].addr_string);
+ strcpy (line, asm_lines[i].addr_string);
cur_len = strlen (line);
/* Add spaces to make the instructions start on the same column */
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ tui_set_disassem_content (CORE_ADDR pc)
cur_len++;
}
- strcat (line, lines[i].insn);
+ strcat (line, asm_lines[i].insn);
/* Now copy the line taking the offset into account */
if (strlen (line) > offset)
@@ -249,15 +249,15 @@ tui_set_disassem_content (CORE_ADDR pc)
else
src->line[0] = '\0';
- src->line_or_addr.addr = lines[i].addr;
- src->is_exec_point = lines[i].addr == cur_pc;
+ src->line_or_addr.addr = asm_lines[i].addr;
+ src->is_exec_point = asm_lines[i].addr == cur_pc;
/* See whether there is a breakpoint installed. */
src->has_break = (!src->is_exec_point
&& breakpoint_here_p (pc) != no_breakpoint_here);
- xfree (lines[i].addr_string);
- xfree (lines[i].insn);
+ xfree (asm_lines[i].addr_string);
+ xfree (asm_lines[i].insn);
}
TUI_DISASM_WIN->generic.content_size = i;
return TUI_SUCCESS;
Index: tui-regs.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/tui/tui-regs.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 tui-regs.c
--- tui-regs.c 10 Feb 2004 19:08:16 -0000 1.11
+++ tui-regs.c 25 Feb 2004 01:05:14 -0000
@@ -277,9 +277,15 @@ tui_display_registers_from (int start_el
TUI_DATA_WIN->detail.data_display_info.regs_content_count > 0)
{
int i = start_element_no;
- int j, value_chars_wide, item_win_width, cur_y, label_width;
+ int j, value_chars_wide, item_win_width, cur_y;
enum precision_type precision;
+ /* Do not rename the following variable into "label_width".
+ Unfortunately, term.h on AiX systems defines a macro with
+ the same name, which causes a build failure if we use the
+ same name for this variable. */
+ int tui_label_width;
+
precision = (TUI_DATA_WIN->detail.data_display_info.regs_display_type
== TUI_DFLOAT_REGS) ?
double_precision : unspecified_precision;
@@ -287,7 +293,7 @@ tui_display_registers_from (int start_el
TUI_DATA_WIN->detail.data_display_info.regs_display_type == TUI_DFLOAT_REGS)
{
value_chars_wide = DOUBLE_FLOAT_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = DOUBLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = DOUBLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
else
{
@@ -295,15 +301,15 @@ tui_display_registers_from (int start_el
TUI_SFLOAT_REGS)
{
value_chars_wide = SINGLE_FLOAT_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = SINGLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = SINGLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
else
{
value_chars_wide = SINGLE_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = SINGLE_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = SINGLE_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
}
- item_win_width = value_chars_wide + label_width;
+ item_win_width = value_chars_wide + tui_label_width;
/*
** Now create each data "sub" window, and write the display into it.
*/
@@ -859,15 +865,21 @@ tui_display_register (int reg_num,
{
int i;
char buf[40];
- int value_chars_wide, label_width;
+ int value_chars_wide;
struct tui_data_element * data_element_ptr = &((tui_win_content)
win_info->content)[0]->which_element.data;
+ /* Do not rename the following variable into "label_width".
+ Unfortunately, term.h on AiX systems defines a macro with
+ the same name, which causes a build failure if we use the
+ same name for this variable. */
+ int tui_label_width;
+
if (IS_64BIT ||
TUI_DATA_WIN->detail.data_display_info.regs_display_type == TUI_DFLOAT_REGS)
{
value_chars_wide = DOUBLE_FLOAT_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = DOUBLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = DOUBLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
else
{
@@ -875,18 +887,18 @@ tui_display_register (int reg_num,
TUI_SFLOAT_REGS)
{
value_chars_wide = SINGLE_FLOAT_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = SINGLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = SINGLE_FLOAT_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
else
{
value_chars_wide = SINGLE_VALUE_WIDTH;
- label_width = SINGLE_LABEL_WIDTH;
+ tui_label_width = SINGLE_LABEL_WIDTH;
}
}
buf[0] = (char) 0;
tui_register_format (buf,
- value_chars_wide + label_width,
+ value_chars_wide + tui_label_width,
reg_num,
data_element_ptr,
precision);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-25 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-23 23:05 Joel Brobecker
2004-02-24 23:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-25 1:11 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040225011117.GF542@gnat.com \
--to=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox