From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30382 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 23:35:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30370 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 23:35:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay2.EECS.Berkeley.EDU) (169.229.60.28) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 23:35:52 -0000 Received: from relay3.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay2.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.10/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i1GNZpYK006783 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:35:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.153.227]) by relay3.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.10/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i1GNZoFU027744; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:35:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/3.141592645) with ESMTP id i1GNZorW011596; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:35:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (hilfingr@localhost) by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id i1GNZnGO011593; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:35:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402162335.i1GNZnGO011593@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Add SYMBOL_SET_LINKAGE_NAME Reply-To: Hilfinger@CS.Berkeley.EDU In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:57:43 -0500. <20040216225743.GA1714@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <11589.1076974549.1@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:35:00 -0000 From: Paul Hilfinger X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 > Sure. I'm not sure if it's actually going to end up this way, since > I'm thinking it wasn't a great idea and it has some truly gross bits I > haven't figured out what to do with yet - it was just a hack job last > weekend. But here's what my current tree does. For reasons we discussed a while ago, a change along these lines would certainly be helpful to us. In fact, in response to a request that I make demangled names more permanent, I found myself forced to introduce essentially your has_demangled_names flag into the Ada version. So, it's in our interest to ask what these reservations and "gross bits" are and whether we might offer any suggestions. Paul Hilfinger ACT