From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18519 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 21:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18509 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 21:31:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.31.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 21:31:02 -0000 Received: from faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui1d [131.188.31.34]) by faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.9-FAU) with ESMTP id WAA18839; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:31:01 +0100 (CET) From: Ulrich Weigand Received: (from weigand@localhost) by faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.6-FAU) id WAA18235; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:31:01 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200402162131.WAA18235@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Per-architecture DWARF CFI register state initialization To: cagney@gnu.org (Andrew Cagney) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:31:00 -0000 Cc: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz), weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Weigand), kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <40312D01.3040704@gnu.org> from "Andrew Cagney" at Feb 16, 2004 03:50:09 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > I've committed the attatched. It follows the convention described in > that revised doco patch I posted: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-02/msg00381.html This fixes the problem I was seeing. Using DWARF-2 frames now works on s390 without any changes to common code. :-) Thanks! Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de