From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9570 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 19:44:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9547 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 19:44:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 19:44:09 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Asof3-0001SY-AN for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:44:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] mention C++ support in NEWS Message-ID: <20040216194409.GB1819@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <6654-Wed11Feb2004213143+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6654-Wed11Feb2004213143+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00425.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: David Carlton > > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:15:27 -0800 > > > > +* C++ nested types and namespaces > > + > > +GDB's support for nested types and namespaces in C++ has been > > +improved. We recommend that you use the DWARF 2 debugging format to > > +get the full benefit from this; this is the default for recent > > +versions of GCC on most platforms. > > + > > IMHO, this text is okay, but perhaps it will sound much more useful if > you add some examples of situations where GDB previously didn't work, > and now does. Yes, I think this would be nice. OTOH, I'm willig to approve it as posted too. Up to you, David. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer