From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] sh-tdep.c: optimize and rename virtual register conversion functions
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040216165233.GO18953@cygbert.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16432.60630.254802.622655@localhost.redhat.com>
On Feb 16 11:16, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > So, if you think that the test should be kept in that function, that's
> > fine with me. The only remaining bit is the naming of the function then.
> > The new cpu is not a sh4 type, but it's using the same pseudo register
> > functions as the sh4. The function would just not be sh4 specific anymore.
>
> Ok, thanks. Just rename the function for now, we can revisit later.
OK, thank you. I've applied the below patch.
Corinna
Index: sh-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/sh-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.160
diff -u -p -r1.160 sh-tdep.c
--- sh-tdep.c 16 Feb 2004 16:04:18 -0000 1.160
+++ sh-tdep.c 16 Feb 2004 16:51:45 -0000
@@ -1519,8 +1519,8 @@ sh_default_register_type (struct gdbarch
because they are stored as 4 individual FP elements. */
static void
-sh_sh4_register_convert_to_virtual (int regnum, struct type *type,
- char *from, char *to)
+sh_register_convert_to_virtual (int regnum, struct type *type,
+ char *from, char *to)
{
if (regnum >= DR0_REGNUM && regnum <= DR_LAST_REGNUM)
{
@@ -1535,8 +1535,8 @@ sh_sh4_register_convert_to_virtual (int
}
static void
-sh_sh4_register_convert_to_raw (struct type *type, int regnum,
- const void *from, void *to)
+sh_register_convert_to_raw (struct type *type, int regnum,
+ const void *from, void *to)
{
if (regnum >= DR0_REGNUM && regnum <= DR_LAST_REGNUM)
{
@@ -1587,10 +1587,9 @@ sh_pseudo_register_read (struct gdbarch
+ register_size (gdbarch,
base_regnum) * portion));
/* We must pay attention to the endiannes. */
- sh_sh4_register_convert_to_virtual (reg_nr,
- gdbarch_register_type (gdbarch,
- reg_nr),
- temp_buffer, buffer);
+ sh_register_convert_to_virtual (reg_nr,
+ gdbarch_register_type (gdbarch, reg_nr),
+ temp_buffer, buffer);
}
else if (reg_nr >= FV0_REGNUM && reg_nr <= FV_LAST_REGNUM)
{
@@ -1617,8 +1616,8 @@ sh_pseudo_register_write (struct gdbarch
base_regnum = dr_reg_base_num (reg_nr);
/* We must pay attention to the endiannes. */
- sh_sh4_register_convert_to_raw (gdbarch_register_type (gdbarch, reg_nr),
- reg_nr, buffer, temp_buffer);
+ sh_register_convert_to_raw (gdbarch_register_type (gdbarch, reg_nr),
+ reg_nr, buffer, temp_buffer);
/* Write the real regs for which this one is an alias. */
for (portion = 0; portion < 2; portion++)
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-16 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 16:14 Corinna Vinschen
2004-02-10 16:17 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-02-16 15:29 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-16 15:55 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-02-16 16:20 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-16 16:52 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040216165233.GO18953@cygbert.vinschen.de \
--to=vinschen@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox