From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18362 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2004 18:15:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18346 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2004 18:15:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2004 18:15:07 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GIF6b04656 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:15:06 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GIF4M31335; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:15:05 -0500 Received: from 192.168.1.129 (vpn50-70.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.70]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GIF0X23742; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:15:03 -0800 From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com To: Elena Zannoni , fnf@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Handle sh-elf-gcc scheduling code into a prologue when no debug info present Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnf@redhat.com References: <200402121505.37560.fnf@ninemoons.com> <16432.58615.340874.880645@localhost.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16432.58615.340874.880645@localhost.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402161114.57944.fnf@ninemoons.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00415.txt.bz2 On Monday 16 February 2004 08:42, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Is this in our testsuite? (it looks familiar) If not could it be added? It is not in there directly, but was found as a side effect of gdb1291. I'll go ahead and report it as a distinct gdb bug to get a bug number and then add a test in gdb.arch. > > With the attached patch, the prologue scanner returns the pc of the > > jsr instruction, allowing the breakpoint at main to be hit before the > > breakpoint at sub1: > > OK. I'll post an updated patch when I have a test ready to go with it, and then check them in. -Fred