From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20751 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2004 01:20:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20744 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2004 01:20:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2004 01:20:35 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AsAxX-0004u4-6H; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:20:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Time for a HP/PA hackathon? Message-ID: <20040215012035.GA18808@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040214200010.B076E4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040214200010.B076E4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:00:10PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote: > It's easier for me if gdb doesn't branch until gcc 3.3.3 has released, > and a lot easier if binutils doesn't branch until gdb 6.1 has released > (preferably until after gdb gdb-6_1-branch has died). That's not going to happen. I am already several weeks behind on branching binutils; I plan to do it at my next opportunity. I'm not thrilled about the timing of the 64-bit off_t changes either. But we'll get over it soon enough :) -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer