From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3091 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2004 20:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3040 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 20:37:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 20:37:05 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040213203703.TDUW19763.lakemtao02.cox.net@white>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:37:03 -0500 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ark3c-0000Ga-00; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:37:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:37:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Zap mi1 reference Message-ID: <20040213203704.GA654@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <402D2DF2.8030001@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <402D2DF2.8030001@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 03:05:06PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > This removes a reference to "mi1" in the documentation. It's no longer > tested (hence 'supported'). I don't really know how I feel about dropping support for old mi versions. Is that the plan for future versions of mi? I think the MI functions should be backwards compatible. Are they? Bob Rossi