From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25044 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2004 21:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25029 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2004 21:23:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.uk.superh.com) (193.128.105.170) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Feb 2004 21:23:23 -0000 Received: from sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com (sh-uk-ex01 [192.168.16.17]) by smtp.uk.superh.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1CLMiAA002808; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:22:47 GMT Received: from linsvr1.uk.superh.com ([192.168.16.50]) by sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:24:13 +0000 Received: (from renneckej@localhost) by linsvr1.uk.superh.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i1CLMhJ11637; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:22:43 GMT From: Joern Rennecke Message-Id: <200402122122.i1CLMhJ11637@linsvr1.uk.superh.com> Subject: Re: [RFA] sh-sim: thislock/prevlock tweak To: msnyder@redhat.com (Michael Snyder) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:23:00 -0000 Cc: msnyder@redhat.com (Michael Snyder), joern.rennecke@superh.com (Joern Rennecke), amylaar@fairadsl.co.uk (Joern Rennecke), gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <402BDA62.3040906@redhat.com> from "Michael Snyder" at Feb 12, 2004 11:56:18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2004 21:24:13.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FF138E0:01C3F1AE] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 > Can I take this as approved? I could check the timings, but then I couldn't make a decision regarding the FSF repository because of the NDA. So, let's say it's approved if you are satisfied that the timings make more sense this way that without the patch.