From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25258 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2004 15:18:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25226 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2004 15:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2004 15:18:13 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Aqw7u-0002IH-00; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:10 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7B88F4B104; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:18:16 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, eliz@elta.co.il Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Build TUI when curses Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040211151816.7B88F4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:18:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 If there is no curses library, then readline won't build, so it's okay for gdb to require curses as well (until someone reorganizes gdb so that it can be built without readline). My two cents: it's okay to clean it up, and it's also okay to let it abort. It's all good. Michael C