From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11601 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 18:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11560 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2004 18:40:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2004 18:40:10 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aqcnq-0007Vc-E4 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:40:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:40:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] "tui" Message-ID: <20040210184009.GA28778@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <402923AD.7060104@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <402923AD.7060104@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > This modifies the build machinery so that the program "tui" is built. > "tui" starts up GDB's TUI (or Text User Interface). Alternative program > names include "tgdb", "gdbtui", ... > > Comments? Otherwize look to commit it round 16th Feb. Any of those names sound great to me. I think that one with "gdb" in it would be clearer; unlike Insight, the TUI does not have a separate life from GDB. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer