From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32363 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2004 19:53:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32343 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2004 19:53:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2004 19:53:33 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1AJrWb32762 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:53:32 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1AJrWi16822 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:53:32 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-3.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.3]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1AJrVvG019923 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:53:31 -0500 Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i1AJrQcG020510 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:53:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] "tui" Message-Id: <20040210125326.6ae7e4ba@saguaro> In-Reply-To: <20040210184009.GA28778@nevyn.them.org> References: <402923AD.7060104@gnu.org> <20040210184009.GA28778@nevyn.them.org> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:40:10 -0500 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > > This modifies the build machinery so that the program "tui" is built. > > "tui" starts up GDB's TUI (or Text User Interface). Alternative program > > names include "tgdb", "gdbtui", ... > > > > Comments? Otherwize look to commit it round 16th Feb. > > Any of those names sound great to me. I think that one with "gdb" in it > would be clearer; unlike Insight, the TUI does not have a separate life > from GDB. I too would prefer one of the names with "gdb" in it somewhere. Kevin