From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9805 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 22:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9798 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 22:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 22:55:53 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AqKJa-0000dY-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:55:42 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id CFC1F4B363; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:56:01 -0500 (EST) To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: make 'break abort' work with new pending breakpoints Message-Id: <20040209225601.CFC1F4B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:55:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 > gdb_breakpoint "main" {allow-pending} > runto "main" {allow-pending} Something like that is okay with me -- exploiting the varargs features of TCL rather than adding another proc. I'm not fluent in TCL so I definitely have no sense of style in that area. I should just curl up with the TCL book already. Michael C