Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: make 'break abort' work with new pending breakpoints

Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-09T22:51:33Z

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:45:45PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> > None of that reference was in your message, and I don't run tests with
> > binutils HEAD regularly...
>
> No big deal. I wrote to binutils@ when it happened, and I've been
> whining it about it my "60 versus HEAD" comparisons. I figured it
> was just information overload.
>
> If you could take a look at pr gdb/1470 now just to get it into your L2
> cache I'd be grateful.
>
> > I suppose. I don't much care either way though the new parameter seems
> > awkward to me - isn't the _with_pending in the name enough?
>
> My intuition says "no". An interface with a parameter is more flexible.
>
> But my intuition can be wrong, and my taste can be misguided.

I think the options are:
gdb_breakpoint_with_pending_flag "main" "yes"
gdb_breakpoint "main" "yes"
gdb_breakpoint_with_pending "main"

Hmm, that second one is nice. Or:
gdb_breakpoint "main" {allow-pending}
runto "main" {allow-pending}

How do you feel about that? This is TCL, after all, we can use it.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer