From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3811 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2004 22:51:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3791 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2004 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Feb 2004 22:51:32 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AqKFU-00028B-M6 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:51:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 22:51:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: make 'break abort' work with new pending breakpoints Message-ID: <20040209225128.GA8124@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040209224545.2C05B4B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040209224545.2C05B4B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:45:45PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote: > > None of that reference was in your message, and I don't run tests with > > binutils HEAD regularly... > > No big deal. I wrote to binutils@ when it happened, and I've been > whining it about it my "60 versus HEAD" comparisons. I figured it > was just information overload. > > If you could take a look at pr gdb/1470 now just to get it into your L2 > cache I'd be grateful. > > > I suppose. I don't much care either way though the new parameter seems > > awkward to me - isn't the _with_pending in the name enough? > > My intuition says "no". An interface with a parameter is more flexible. > > But my intuition can be wrong, and my taste can be misguided. I think the options are: gdb_breakpoint_with_pending_flag "main" "yes" gdb_breakpoint "main" "yes" gdb_breakpoint_with_pending "main" Hmm, that second one is nice. Or: gdb_breakpoint "main" {allow-pending} runto "main" {allow-pending} How do you feel about that? This is TCL, after all, we can use it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer