Re: [rfa/testsuite] gdb1250.exp: make 'break abort' work with new pending breakpoints

[mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)]

mec> This test is sensitive to the version of binutils because binutils HEAD
mec> has a PLT optimization for shared library functions.

drow> So it used to fail with binutils HEAD, right?

"Used to" as in "has been failing since 2003-11-27 to 2004-02-09", yes.
It was pr gdb/1470.  Maybe it slipped off your radar screen.

> - Should there be a version of gdb_breakpoint that answers yes to the
> pending question?
> - If so, should runto use it?  Or should there be a version of runto
> that does?

Err, yeah.  I suppose the right thing is to make

  gdb_breakpoint_with_pending $name $pendingp

Then:

  proc gdb_breakpoint { name } {
    return gdb_breakpoint_with_pending "$name" "no"
  }

I see 3 instance of "gdb_breakpoint exit" and they need to be
investigated.

On principle, same with "runto".

I don't know what the right name is, either.  But I do think that the
the new functions should take a second parameter.

Michael C