From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] use frame IDs to detect function calls while stepping
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040205190115.GA9918@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040205171324.GF18961@gnat.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:13:24PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> + if (ecs->stop_func_name == NULL
> + && step_over_calls == STEP_OVER_UNDEBUGGABLE)
> + {
> + /* We couldn't determine where we stopped, so we just stepped
> + inside undebuggable code. Since we want to step over this
> + kind of code, we keep going until the inferior returns from
> + the current function. */
The test and the comment don't seem to match. Code with only minimal
symbols will still set stop_func_name.
> + if (IN_SOLIB_CALL_TRAMPOLINE (stop_pc, ecs->stop_func_name))
> + {
> + /* We landed in a shared library call trampoline, so it
> + is a subroutine call. */
> + handle_step_into_function (ecs);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (get_prev_frame (get_current_frame ())),
> + step_frame_id))
> + {
> + /* It's a subroutine call. */
> + handle_step_into_function (ecs);
> + return;
> + }
> +
get_prev_frame can return NULL. In fact, it generally does in main.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-05 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-05 4:41 Joel Brobecker
2004-02-05 17:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-02-05 18:54 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-07 4:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-02-27 15:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-01 19:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-01 23:52 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-02 6:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-03 21:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-02 15:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-02 22:07 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-06 0:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-05 19:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-02-05 19:23 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-05 19:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-09 19:21 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040205190115.GA9918@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox