From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-30307-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23136 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2004 22:36:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23129 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2004 22:36:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2004 22:36:04 -0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
	by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2CC78357B; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 14:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i11Ma2Oi013707;
	Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:36:02 -0800
Received: (from roland@localhost)
	by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i11Ma25b013703;
	Sun, 1 Feb 2004 14:36:02 -0800
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 22:36:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200402012236.i11Ma25b013703@magilla.sf.frob.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] auxv support
In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of  Sunday, 1 February 2004 01:04:19 -0500 <20040201060419.GA22586@nevyn.them.org>
X-Zippy-Says: 
   Did you GAIN WEIGHT in th' past 5 MINUTES or am I just DREAMING of
   two BROCCOLI FLORETS lying in an empty GAS TANK?
X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

> List reply bites again.  If you are not subscribed to gdb-patches,
> please use a reply-to or something along those lines... otherwise I
> assume it was just mail lag.

Well, we're both explicitly in headers for this thread now, so I'll leave
at that.  Reply-To causes yet more trouble.

> I've approved the rest of the patch, so go ahead and check it in, along
> with the documentation.  Then we can get back to the testcase and
> remote support.

Okey dokey.  I've checked it in.


Thanks,
Roland