From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3336 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2004 21:53:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3320 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2004 21:53:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 21:53:06 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AkVhh-0002CV-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:52:33 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3234B4B366; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:52:33 -0500 (EST) To: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/cp/testsuite] local.exp: update "ptype Local", is now "ptype l" Message-Id: <20040124215233.3234B4B366@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:53:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2 > I would prefer that you not do this. "ptype l" does give more > informative output, precisely because it is an easier problem to solve. > By all means add the new "ptype l" test, but please don't remove the > existing "ptype Local" test. I think that is redundant, but redundancy does not hurt. Okay, I'll add back in "ptype Local". It will have to FAIL, though, I'm not going to write a KFAIL for a generic message. Michael C