From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15193 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2004 07:31:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15186 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2004 07:31:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 07:31:50 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AkIGG-0001cX-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:31:20 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 19CB24B363; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:31:20 -0500 (EST) To: drow@mvista.com, jjohnstn@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]: pending breakpoint support [2/3] Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040124073120.19CB24B363@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:31:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 I don't have the power to approve test suite patches, but I endorse it for approval to the people who do. I haven't proofread it in detail or tested it, but superficially it looks okay. If it blows up after it goes in then I'll be happy to diagnose it and fix it. Michael C