From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-30135-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27445 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 22:44:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27438 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 22:44:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 22:44:13 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0MMi49e002261;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:44:04 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0MMi3Sm043487;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:44:03 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i0MMi3md043484;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:44:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:44:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200401222244.i0MMi3md043484@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: cgd@broadcom.com
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <yov54qund41y.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> (cgd@broadcom.com)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Recognize OpenBSD ELF
References: <200401222156.i0MLubYk016536@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
 <mailpost.1074808619.15112@news-sj1-1> <yov54qund41y.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2

   From: cgd@broadcom.com
   Date: 22 Jan 2004 14:14:17 -0800

   At Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC), "Mark Kettenis" wrote:
   > The attached patch is pretty obvious, so I committed it.

   i do wonder what the intended ordering of stuff in that function is.
   looks like previous to this, things were in alphabetical order:

	   .note.ABI-tag
	   .note.netbsd.ident
	   .note.netbsdcore.procinfo

   i dunno.  probably not worth thinking about now, but maybe for
   somebody who adds the next thing.

Well, I added .note.netbsd.ident and .note.netbsdcore.procinfo, so I
can say that the alphabetical order is completely unintentional.  I'd
like to keep the .note.openbsd.ident close to .note.netbsd.ident since
they're almost identical.

Mark