Re: [RFA]: pending breakpoint support [1/3]

Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-03T06:07:36Z

> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:18:26 -0500
> From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> >
> Ok, how about the accompanying patch?
>
> -- Jeff J.
>
> 2004-02-02 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
>
> * NEWS: Add information about new pending breakpoint support.

Thanks. Is it possible to modify the wording so that it doesn't use
passive tense so much? I'm told by native English speakers that
passive is BAD...

For example, this:

> If a breakpoint location cannot be found, you are queried to see if
> you wish to make the breakpoint pending on a future shared-library
> load.

could be rephrased like this:

If a breakpoint location cannot be found, GDB queries you if you
wish to make the breakpoint pending on ...

Etc., you get the point.

TIA