Re: [RFA]: pending breakpoint support [1/3]

Jeff Johnston
2004-01-31T00:33:38Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:45:55PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
>
>
>>Well, therein lies the problem. The word "if" might or might not be
>>part of the symbol. The
>>regular logic relies on parsing out the symbol first and then looking at
>>the aftermath. I don't have
>>that luxury so I punt. It may be slightly confusing if the user does
>>the scenario above, but the
>>displayed pending breakpoint info is meant to be the "original
>>breakpoint string" so I don't anticipate
>>the user will object too much. Ok or do you have a better idea?
>>
>>
>
>Right, I see. This is fine. The patch is OK to commit with the
>"resolved" wording change - thanks for your patience!
>
>

Thanks.