Re: [RFA]: pending breakpoint support [1/3]

Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-30T23:45:46Z

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:45:55PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Well, therein lies the problem. The word "if" might or might not be
> part of the symbol. The
> regular logic relies on parsing out the symbol first and then looking at
> the aftermath. I don't have
> that luxury so I punt. It may be slightly confusing if the user does
> the scenario above, but the
> displayed pending breakpoint info is meant to be the "original
> breakpoint string" so I don't anticipate
> the user will object too much. Ok or do you have a better idea?

Right, I see. This is fine. The patch is OK to commit with the
"resolved" wording change - thanks for your patience!

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer