From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-30112-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20346 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2004 22:16:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20242 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2004 22:16:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2004 22:16:31 -0000
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228])
	by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 01777357B; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0LMGUOi025993;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:16:30 -0800
Received: (from roland@localhost)
	by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0LMGUOn025989;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:16:30 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200401212216.i0LMGUOn025989@magilla.sf.frob.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] auxv support via xfer_partial, for core files and /proc
In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of  Wednesday, 21 January 2004 17:13:53 -0500 <20040121221353.GA3324@nevyn.them.org>
Emacs: featuring the world's first municipal garbage collector!
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2

> This could be an independent patch, couldn't it?  In the interest of
> progress, you may wish to submit it separately.  Of course it would
> have to come after rather than before... so maybe not.

Yes, yes, and yes (no).

> The configury is already there, FYI.  Grep for HAVE_PREAD64 in linux-proc.c.

I know.  When I said "didn't bother", I meant "didn't bother".  Ten more
lines of #ifdef-heavy splort in a function that only needs to be ten lines
total, to avoid an lseek call that won't ever be made in reality.