From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25159 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 18:20:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25134 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 18:20:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 18:20:47 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aie10-00055D-Ix for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:20:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix some 64-bit Objective-C bugs Message-ID: <20040119182046.GA13181@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <4AA3687E-4AA5-11D8-BD86-000A277AC1A4@doc.com> <400C1F98.7080106@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <400C1F98.7080106@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:19:04PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >Andrew told me to wait on this as Ulrich needed to send in an assignment. > >I don't think that has been done yet (at least it hasn't been processed). > > Yes, better safe than sorry. Ulrich, can IBM do the paperwork for all > the stuff that's approved (this would leave just frame cleanup). OK, thanks for the update! Filing this back in pending. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer