From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21341 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 23:21:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21334 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 23:21:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 23:21:51 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JNLol08450 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:21:50 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JNLoa08977; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:21:50 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-57.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.57]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0JNLoR0008971; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:21:50 -0500 Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0JNLicG002021; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:21:44 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:21:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: "J. Johnston" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [obish] -Wunused-function warnings Message-Id: <20040119162144.64202cb5@saguaro> In-Reply-To: <400C227B.9040704@gnu.org> References: <400194E8.10201@gnu.org> <400C227B.9040704@gnu.org> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:31:23 -0500 Andrew Cagney wrote: > src/gdb/ia64-tdep.c:3261: warning: `process_note_abi_tag_sections' defined but not used > src/gdb/ia64-tdep.c:342: warning: `read_sigcontext_register' defined but not used > src/gdb/ia64-tdep.c:654: warning: `ia64_read_fp' defined but not used It appears to me that it's safe to remove these function definitions. Jeff, would mind trying it out? If everything still builds and runs okay, the patch which removes these definitions is preapproved. Thanks, Kevin