From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31098 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 06:06:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31088 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 06:06:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 06:06:38 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AiSYV-0004Ny-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:06:35 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id DFA504B359; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:06:42 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] pc bounds checking and namespaces Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040119060642.DFA504B359@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:06:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 Elena Zannoni writes: > Again, a sanity check with 2.95 and -gdwarf-2 would be good. I'm about to add carlton_dictionary-branch and drow-cplus-branch to my test bed. That ought to help. Instead of finding these problems at the point of merging the branches onto HEAD, how about if we fix the branches so that they have zero regressions versus gdb 6.0, and then merge the branches? Michael C