From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-29986-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28067 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2004 15:08:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28052 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2004 15:07:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2004 15:07:59 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0IF7keT007613;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:07:46 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0IF7kBd053656;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:07:46 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i0IF7jWv053653;
	Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:07:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 15:08:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200401181507.i0IF7jWv053653@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <40095693.90007@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 17
	Jan 2004 10:36:51 -0500)
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Give decr pc after break a default of zero
References: <40071B7A.3080106@gnu.org> <200401161623.i0GGNsEF000356@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <40095693.90007@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2

   Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:36:51 -0500
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   > Removing the set-to-zero for Neutrino would be wrong; it is essential
   > that we override the i386 default.  Personally I think the "NOTE" form
   > of the comment you added isn't really appropriate.  I'd prefer
   > something like:
   > 
   >    /* Neutrino rewinds to look more normal, so we have to override the
   >       i386 default value.  */
   > 
   > Since that explains why we override the i386 default value.  It's
   > probably a matter of taste, but I'd appreciate if you changes it that
   > way.

   I've changed it to:
   ``Neutrino rewinds to look more normal.  Need to override the i386 
   default which is [unfortunatly] to decrement the PC.''

   Make's it clear which is "wrong" :-)  committed,

Thanks!

Mark