From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26701 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 21:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26694 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 21:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 21:57:11 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhyRL-0005B7-9k for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:57:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Delete DECR_PC_AFTER_HW_BREAK and SHIFT_INST_REGS Message-ID: <20040117215711.GA19866@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040117193344.GA15991@nevyn.them.org> <40098F2E.4090805@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40098F2E.4090805@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00452.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >Neither of these is defined any longer. I think at least SHIFT_INST_REGS > >went out with the m88k port. Unless someone objects, I'll delete them in a > >few days. > > No reason to wait - your removing "obviously dead code"! I suppose so :) Checked in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer