From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17427 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 22:24:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17360 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 22:24:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 22:24:19 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgWwt-0006nA-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:23:47 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id AC4A64B104; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:24:05 -0500 (EST) To: ezannoni@redhat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040113222405.AC4A64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:24:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 I've seen this "unknown debugging format" before, on dwarf-1. I really agree with daniel's idea that the test should be "if format == dwarf-2" rather than "if format != stabs+". > Maybe the two unsupported messages should differ a bit more from each > other: "cannot produce separate debug info file" instead? How about "strip --strip-debug failed", make it really clear. Michael C