From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9161 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2004 22:10:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9154 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 22:10:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 22:10:29 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AfnmT-0003Ed-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:10:01 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id F06104ACDA; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:10:05 -0500 (EST) To: cagney@gnu.org, eliz@elta.co.il, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al. Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040111221005.F06104ACDA@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:10:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 > Hmm, wouldn't gdb/mi/ChangeLog-1995-2003 be more consistent with > gdb/ChangeLog-2003 et.al.? Yes. I think it looks better, too. Michael C