From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17923 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 20:20:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17810 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 20:20:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 20:20:07 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AegdS-0003WN-Ii; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:20:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] KFAIL EBUSY kernel bug Message-ID: <20040108202006.GA13474@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3FFDB9A7.4090801@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFDB9A7.4090801@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 03:12:23PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > Ref: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1502 > Turns out that the EBUSY error status value I was seeing is a Linux > Kernel bug. This KFAIL's that case. > > baring problems, I'll commit in a few days If it's a Linux kernel bug, that makes it an XFAIL, not a KFAIL. > 2004-01-08 Andrew Cagney > > * gdb.base/fileio.exp: For "Renaming a directory to a non-empty > directory returns ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST", treat EBUSY as a KFAIL. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer