Re: [patch/testsuite/cp] ctti.exp: partial overhaul

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:12:30PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote:
> But alas, there is more work to do.  There are a lot of FAILs with
> both gcc and hp ac++.  Like this:
> 
>   # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
>   print add<int>(2,2)
>   No symbol "add<int>" in current context.
>   (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/ctti.exp: print add<int>(2,2)

Yes, I'm aware of (and recently described) the issue.  It doesn't work
because the function has its return type in its mangled name, which
boggles GDB's symbol table.  I'll fix this on drow-cplus-branch - but
probably not until at least February.

> I am not going to get into the bugs with gcc right now.  So I exited the
> test script early, right after "break main".  At least it builds the
> executable now.

How about some KFAILs for GCC so I can see what I'm doing? :)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer