Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al.

Eli Zaretskii
2004-01-11T20:57:18Z

> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:43:11 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>
> > eli z writes:
> >
> > gdb/mi/ChangeLog.1995-2003
> > gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog.1999-2003
> >
> >
> > Looks good to me! I like that better than my idea.
> >
> > Two ya's no nay's, I'll organize a patch.
>
> Hmm, wouldn't gdb/mi/ChangeLog-1995-2003 be more consistent with
> gdb/ChangeLog-2003 et.al.?

Why, you're looking for an opportunity to add more lines to
fnchange.lst even when they can be avoided? ;-)