Re: mi/ChangeLog et.al.

Eli Zaretskii
2004-01-06T06:26:18Z

> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:10:31 -0500 (EST)
> From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
>
> How about:
>
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1995
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1996
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1997
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1998
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1999
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2000
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2001
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2002
> gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2003
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-1999
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2000
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2001
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2002
> testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog-2003

I don't get it: gdb/mi/ and gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ both have a single
ChangeLog file. Why would we want to create multiple files from them?

If all you want is to slightly change the name and put the years in
it, why not simply

gdb/mi/ChangeLog.1995-2003
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog.1999-2003

?