From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26306 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2004 21:06:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26299 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2004 21:06:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2004 21:06:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1Adbvr-0003LY-U7; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:06:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 21:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ping - PR1473 Message-ID: <20040105210626.GA11599@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Paul Brook References: <200401051128.37903.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401051128.37903.paul@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:28:37AM +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > I submitted a patch to fix PR1473 a couple of weeks ago, but haven't recieved > any feedback. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-12/msg00426.html > > I forgot to put [patch] in the subject line, so I guess it might have slipped > past unnoticed. It slipped past because no one likes to deal with infrun :) I don't like the idea of adding this test to keep_going. This should only be necessary in the BPSTAT_WHAT_CHECK_SHLIBS case, correct? Somethng like this: - if (stop_on_solib_events) + if (stop_on_solib_events || stop_stack_dummy) I don't know if you need a stop_print_frame=0 also if (stop_stack_dummy). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer