From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24442 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2004 02:33:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24435 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2004 02:33:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2004 02:33:57 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AdKYo-0007dD-2o; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 21:33:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 02:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/cp] method stub assertions Message-ID: <20040105023342.GA29313@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20040105023200.112BF4B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105023200.112BF4B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:32:00PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote: > > ! struct type *basetype = > > ! basetype = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (VALUE_TYPE (arg2)); > > Argh! But the compilers didn't error out. > I wonder if that is legal Ansi C? Yes and no. Semantically valid, value undefined, IIRC. It's part of a really hideous GCC extension for disabling uninitialized use warnings. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer