From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10016 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2004 22:47:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10003 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2004 22:47:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2004 22:47:27 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AcuYI-0001y5-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 17:47:26 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id CBDD04B35A; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 17:47:17 -0500 (EST) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deal with GCC bug on 64-bit SPARC Message-Id: <20040103224717.CBDD04B35A@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 22:47:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 > GCC generates code that doesn't conform to the ABI. I hate it when that happens. Can you enhance your comment to say which version of gcc? gcc 3.4 has a different default ABI than gcc 3.3. Michael C