From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1094 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2004 11:52:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1087 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2004 11:52:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mwinf0804.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.22.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jan 2004 11:52:07 -0000 Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (AStDenis-103-1-2-242.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.249.112.242]) by mwinf0804.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7B68F180005B; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:52:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id CC6A947D62; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 15:52:03 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 11:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/patch] handle_inferior_event() extract some code into a separate function Message-ID: <20040103115203.GU820@gnat.com> References: <20031219144323.GL826@gnat.com> <3FF59C76.3000902@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FF59C76.3000902@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 > >This patch implements the first part, which is to extract the code > >inside the we-stepped-into-a-function if block, and move it to its > >own function. It's fairly mechanical. > > > >The next step will be to change the if condition itself to separate > >out the targets where the new frame code is used from the ones where > >the old one is still in use. I will send a patch as soon as this one > >is reviewed. > > M'kay. Thanks. It's in. Now to the next step... -- Joel