From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10049 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 11:30:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9973 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 11:29:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gatekeeper.osp.nl) (212.238.163.113) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 11:29:59 -0000 Received: (from amavis@localhost) by gatekeeper.osp.nl (8.12.2+patch/8.12.2) id hBNBTwDX024961 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:29:58 +0100 Received: from copland.osp.nl.osp.nl (localhost.osp.nl [127.0.0.1]) by gatekeeper.osp.nl (8.12.2+patch/8.12.2) with ESMTP id hBNBTt06024789; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:29:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:30:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200312231129.hBNBTt06024789@gatekeeper.osp.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: fnf@ninemoons.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200312221851.10629.fnf@ninemoons.com> (message from Fred Fish on Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:51:10 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove some hardwired assumptions about register sets References: <200312170614.hBH6Ebtl003033@fred.ninemoons.com> <200312221851.10629.fnf@ninemoons.com> X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00472.txt.bz2 From: Fred Fish Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:51:10 -0700 On Tuesday 16 December 2003 23:14, Fred Fish wrote: > This patch removes some hard coded assumptions about the sizes of the > various processor specific register sets, and also allows them to be > of different sizes if necessary. > > Comments? Except for my own followup, there haven't been any comments about this patch. I propose that if there are no objections by this weekend that the patch should be checked in, after the previously noted fix is made of course. Not a real objection, but instead of sizeof()/sizeof() it's probably better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro. Mark