From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1474 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 02:03:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1418 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 02:03:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 02:03:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1AYbtb-0003YH-GK; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:03:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 02:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Fred Fish Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove some hardwired assumptions about register sets Message-ID: <20031223020339.GA13570@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Fred Fish , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200312170614.hBH6Ebtl003033@fred.ninemoons.com> <200312221851.10629.fnf@ninemoons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312221851.10629.fnf@ninemoons.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:51:10PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote: > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 23:14, Fred Fish wrote: > > This patch removes some hard coded assumptions about the sizes of the > > various processor specific register sets, and also allows them to be > > of different sizes if necessary. > > > > Comments? > > Except for my own followup, there haven't been any comments about this > patch. > > I propose that if there are no objections by this weekend that the > patch should be checked in, after the previously noted fix is made of > course. Let's hold off on that. Andrew is the listed maintainer of this code, and he's said that he will be traveling until the end of the month. I like the patch, for what that's worth. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer