From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26253 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2003 01:51:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25898 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 01:51:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fred.ninemoons.com) (68.14.214.217) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 01:51:11 -0000 Received: from fred.ninemoons.com (fred.ninemoons.com [127.0.0.1]) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBN1pBCG006367; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:51:11 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hBN1pAfH006365; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:51:10 -0700 From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove some hardwired assumptions about register sets Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 01:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: fnf@ninemoons.com References: <200312170614.hBH6Ebtl003033@fred.ninemoons.com> In-Reply-To: <200312170614.hBH6Ebtl003033@fred.ninemoons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312221851.10629.fnf@ninemoons.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00470.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 16 December 2003 23:14, Fred Fish wrote: > This patch removes some hard coded assumptions about the sizes of the > various processor specific register sets, and also allows them to be > of different sizes if necessary. > > Comments? Except for my own followup, there haven't been any comments about this patch. I propose that if there are no objections by this weekend that the patch should be checked in, after the previously noted fix is made of course. -Fred