From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12203 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2003 17:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12196 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 17:15:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maynard.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.243) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 17:15:42 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AWInL-00014e-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:15:39 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 28E9B4B412; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:15:44 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] add DMGL_PARAMS (was: new demangler) Message-Id: <20031216171544.28E9B4B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:15:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 Looks okay to me. Be aware that dwarf 2 and stabs+ have had differences in this area. For example, when is_ctor_or_dtor in the demangler was broken, dwarf 2 was not affected, but stabs+ was. So there's always a chance that I'll come back in a few days or a week and say "you broke stabs+"! Michael C === 2003-12-16 David Carlton * cp-support.c (class_name_from_physname): Add DMGL_PARAMS. (method_name_from_physname): Ditto.