From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23000 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2003 06:04:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22988 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2003 06:04:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2003 06:04:41 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AV2tM-0008Mb-Um; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:04:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 06:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: New regression test for breakpoint command freeing Message-ID: <20031213060440.GA32084@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00351.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:55:37AM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > + gdb_test_multiple "run" "run program with breakpoint commands" { No, please don't; any time that you issue an explicit "run" command in a testcase is probably a bug. Take a look at gdb_run_cmd: + gdb_run_cmd + gdb_test_multiple "" "run program with breakpoint commands" { should do it. Otherwise looks fine. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer