From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26999 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2003 04:39:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26983 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 04:39:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fred.ninemoons.com) (68.14.214.217) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 04:39:00 -0000 Received: from fred.ninemoons.com (fred.ninemoons.com [127.0.0.1]) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB94cxB8026514; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:38:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hB94cwD4026512; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:38:58 -0700 From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Accept optional printed address at function breakpoints Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 04:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: fnf@ninemoons.com References: <200312081625.hB8GP6vB017846@fred.ninemoons.com> In-Reply-To: <200312081625.hB8GP6vB017846@fred.ninemoons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312082138.58644.fnf@ninemoons.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 > If we punt on the issue of whether or not the debug info is correct, Just for the record, I reported this as a gcc bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-12/msg01018.html -Fred