From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25926 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2003 17:27:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25913 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2003 17:27:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2003 17:27:16 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ATPA3-00088T-00; Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:27:07 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 102894B412; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:27:01 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com Subject: Re: [commit/testsuite/c++] rtti.exp: accept current warnings Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20031208172701.102894B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:27:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 dc> Why not delete the old message? dc> It's not in GDB's source code any more. Sometimes I like to run gdb 6.0 with the same test suite as gdb HEAD, so that I can distinguish between bugs that are in both gdb 6.0 and gdb HEAD versus bugs that are new in gdb HEAD. Michael C