From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15288 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2003 17:57:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15257 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 17:57:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.31.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 17:57:34 -0000 Received: from faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui1d [131.188.31.34]) by faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.9-FAU) with ESMTP id SAA08662; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:57:32 +0100 (CET) From: Ulrich Weigand Received: (from weigand@localhost) by faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.6-FAU) id SAA08273; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:57:32 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200312051757.SAA08273@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390 bi-arch debugging support To: drow@mvista.com (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:57:00 -0000 Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Weigand), gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20031204204418.GA25174@nevyn.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Dec 04, 2003 03:44:19 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:10:05PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > - All multi-threaded test cases fail. This is because they use > > the proc-service API implemented in linuxthreads_db, and this > > appears to be fundamentally unsuited to handle 32-bit processes > > on a 64-bit host ... I have no idea what to do here. > > FYI, this should work if your glibc is new enough. I believe Andrew > had it working properly on x86-64 (?). I'll be giving it a shot on > MIPS in a couple of days. Thanks for the pointer. With a recent glibc is looks indeed as if this could be make to work. It doesn't actually work at the moment because of what looks like a problem in the s390-specific nptl sysdep files. I'll see how we can get this fixed ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de